
Mike Tannenbaum and Rex Ryan
There is nothing more frustrating, especially as a New York sports fan, then going into a season with high expectations, but to have dismal results. Reporters and fans have been quick to write off players within the Knicks and Jets organizations, pointing the blame towards certain individuals, but the more I give it some more thought, who is really to blame? Now I am not writing off the Knicks as a bad team, given the short preseason and they have only played five games, but due to the same philosophy within the Jets organization, specifically with management, I fear that the Knicks will end up with a very similar result as the Jets did. So I ask again, who is to blame? For Knicks, the combination of Executive Chairman James Dolan, Interim General Manager Glen Grunwald, General Manager from 2008-2011 Donnie Walsh, and Head Coach Mike Dantoni, and for the Jets, the combination of General Manager Mike Tannenbaum, and Head Coach Rex Ryan. Why you may ask? Why not Mark Sanchez? It is very simple. The two teams were built around the wrong philosophy. Both decided to part from chemistry and unity, and decided to go after stars.
The New York Knicks have been in the media quite often the past year and a half, after bringing in stars Amare Stoudemire, and Tyson Chandler via free agency (Chandler was a sign-and-trade), while gutting their roster to trade for Carmelo Anthony. While on paper, the combination may seem like a dominant Big 3, however, you can’t pick any 3 stars, put them together, and expect results. The players need to be able to play together, and compliment each others style of play. When you look at the Boston Celtics, you had (past tense because their prime has past) Garnett playing down low as a big man, Paul Pierce working the mid range jumper, while Ray Allen worked the perimeter with his 3-point range (that’s not including a dominant point guard Rajon Rondo).

(From left to right) Lebron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, Ray Allen, Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce
When you look at the Miami Heat, they have the very same formula which they have finally implemented this year (last season they seemed lost). You have Chris Bosh playing down low, Lebron James working the mid range, and Dwyane Wade working the point. What makes the Boston Celtics and Miami Heat Big 3′s so dominant at their prime is that they are all good passers, compliment each others style of offense, AND PLAY DEFENSE. In the Knicks case, none of those three key factors apply.
In the beginning of last season, Amare Stoudemire appeared to be the perfect fit in New York. He was a big time play maker who brought a lot of hype to the Garden. He was the go-to-guy on the team. At the time however, he had a point guard who could pass and shoot in Raymond Felton, perimeter threats with Danillo Gallinari, Wilson Chandler, and Shawne Williams, and Tony Douglass as a spark off the bench. While they would score around 110 points a game, they couldn’t play defense if their life depended on it. So, what did the Knicks do? They traded half their roster for Carmelo Anthony, the best scorer in the game, who of course plays poor defense. While it was the right move in the fact that they needed a star like Carmelo, he didn’t exactly fit well with Stoudemire. They both have a similar styles of offense, in the sense that they both are strong from mid range and work in isolation situations. However, Amare Stoudemire was still able to dominate with the pick and roll with the recently acquire Chauncey Billups in the Carmelo Anthony trade.

(Left to Right) Tyson Chandler, Carmelo Anthony, Amare Stoudemire form the Knicks Big 3
During this offseason, the Knicks decided to amnesty their commanding point guard Billups in order to bring in the defensive center Tyson Chandler, and promote Tony Douglass to the starting point guard roll (something we all know will never be succesful). While bringing in Tyson Chandler was a great move by the Knicks organization, it indirectly demoted Stoudemire to a roll player, a roll he does not know how to play. Now before you start saying that is ridiculous, read my next point. Amare’s strength is working the pick-and-roll, which is also the strength of Tyson Chandler. By acquiring Chandler, he now runs the pick-and-roll (with a point guard who can’t get him the ball in Douglass). With Chandler taking Amare’s roll, and Carmelo Anthony demanding the isolation on the low post and mid range, Stoudemire has ZERO roll on this offense. He’s a waist of space defensively, so if you think about it, what exactly is his roll on this Knicks team? What the Knicks are lacking now are role players who can compliment Melo and Chandler. With the small chance Baron Davis comes back not just healthy, but in shape, the Knicks need to ship Amare Stoudemire for several roll players, or a commanding point guard, in order to be successful.

Mike D'Antoni
Now do I blame Stoudemire or Douglass for their lack of play? No, not at all. They have been placed in a position where they cannot succeed. They have been set up for failure. Management is not all to blame for this, but D’Antoni as well. He is trying to bring a philosophy to a team that doesn’t fit his philosophy. He likes to run a fast past, run and gun offense. However, he has a bunch of players who work best in a half court offense, not to mention that they have no three point shooting, aside from second round big man Josh Harrellson and Steve Novak. D’Antoni needs to start coaching a philosophy that fits his players, or else the team will not succeed this season, or anytime soon.
Jets coming soon…